Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Type 27 Tank Destroyer by MikeDoscher Type 27 Tank Destroyer by MikeDoscher
Everything old is new again.

Faced with the threat-rich electronic warfare environment of Southeast Asia in the 2060's, defense budgets (both state and nonstate) faced of spiral of threat and expenditure from which there seemed no good escape. Intelligent mines, satellite assisted armored infantry, and a proliferation of automated weapon systems threatened to make what had been a border incident overflow into a wider settling of grudges between neighbors. The use of nonhuman systems threatened to remove accountability from the actors and invite further destabilization.

With this in mind, WESTSOC and some of the PMCs with larger research budgets came up with an elegant solution: The return of ballistic, direct-fire artillery to counter ground forces. Gun laying would be optical, with unaugmented crews and minimal electronic equipment. This would make them largely immune to the jamming and hacking by specialized systems that made the modern battlefield so uncertain. For border interdiction, the future lay in the past.

Based on a Chinese airmobile SPG, the Type 27 utilized a 128mm gun that could also fire a squeeze-bore sub caliber round when fitted with an adapter. While inaccurate, and even dangerous, to fire on the move, it proved an effective deterrent against light armor and armored infantry elements in multiple engagements. The example seen here is also fitted with a laser based CIWS for use against light drones and guided counter battery artillery.
Add a Comment:
 
:icontetravirus:
Tetravirus Featured By Owner 1 day ago  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Found this one while in search of '27' stuff, but had to go take a look at your gallery. A glimpse into the possible future of military technology - and so much with a very believable tale to go with it. 

Yours is a fun journey, to be sure
Reply
:iconalucard234564:
Alucard234564 Featured By Owner 2 days ago  Hobbyist General Artist
I see SABOT!!!!
Reply
:iconanother-eurasian:
Another-Eurasian Featured By Owner Mar 5, 2017  Hobbyist
Ahh! Coolest shit!
Reply
:iconnobodee21:
nobodee21 Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2017
It almost looks like an M103
Reply
:iconstugmeister:
StugMeister Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I'm loving the ww2/modern day mix on this AFV. :D
Reply
:iconcujonuke:
Cujonuke Featured By Owner Feb 9, 2017
Looks like the 2 said arms on the turret are a kind of reactive armor?
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Feb 16, 2017  Professional General Artist
Optical rangefinder. :) The small bumps near the mantlet is another set, serving as backup. The turret can be fitted with ERA blocks though- they attach to those lugs.
Reply
:iconponentguy:
Ponentguy Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2017  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Uuuuuh dangerous and sexy Love 
Reply
:icononesidedbattle:
OneSidedBattle Featured By Owner Apr 7, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Absolutely love this design but what's that final she'll type on the right?
Reply
:iconjlvfr:
jlvfr Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2017
Looks very cool, but you should really close the turret, imho. Open turrets are soooo vulnerable...
Reply
:icontexshi:
Texshi Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2017
That turret looks so sexy it's like a mix between a Battleship and M10 Wolverine and I LOVE both of those
Reply
:iconclayman8:
Clayman8 Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2017
Looking at the hull, it reminds me of one specific Soviet tank i saw at the Kubinka museum last time i was in Russia (worth it btw, if you get the chance to go to Russia try to visit the tank museum). I believe it was the IS2 and IS3 that had that center-mounted pilot nest and angled nose/hull center. Turret design reminds me of the german anti-tank platforms too, but i cant remember the name (there was one with the similar shape and open top).

Love the retro-future design, Mike. Always love taking apart your works for details and inspiration
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Professional General Artist
Thanks you. I know the designs you speak of and yeah, I guess I was thinking about how certain older lines of thinking might be adapted to the present. :)
Reply
:iconkodyyoung:
KodyYoung Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Awesome TD concept.
Reply
:iconrob-cavanna:
Rob-Cavanna Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
That's brilliant, Mike. 
Reply
:iconcoffeepilot:
CoffeePilot Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
As someone who is a huge fan of WWII tank destroyers, and the American M10, M18, and M36 in particular, I love this so much! Question though, why the open turret in front? In American open-topped designs this was largely to facilitate easier movement and reloading of large rounds in an otherwise tight turret, but given a 3 man crew I'm assuming an auto-loader. I'd just do what the M36 did and have a fold-up/fold-down top for shrapnel protection when needed. Still looks awesome though and I really dig the side mounted optical sighting equipment.
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Professional General Artist
Sorry for my delay in replying. :)

The turret can be closed with the addition of an applique plate, just as the sides can be uparmored with ERA blocks. The big reason the base vehicle leaves the top open is to keep the turret short while still granting a lof of depression to the gun. Weight is also a consideration. These are designed for a very different threat environment than say an M10 would have faced. It's not shell splinters or even enemy artillery, but rather smart networked mines and drones that loiter until they can turn themselves into AT missiles. Speed and stealth (both acoustic and electronic) are used here as a sleight of hand to gain a better defensive posture for the parties that employ them.
Reply
:iconcoffeepilot:
CoffeePilot Featured By Owner Mar 14, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Glad to see you gave this all so much thought! I love it when creators but lots of logical thinking into the backstory of their creations. Yes I was thinking good gun depression would definitely be a benefit given by the open top too. That was historically why American and German big tall turreted tanks (and American TDs) had such good gin depression vs sovet low-profile turrets.

Also, cool concept for the 'threats' likely to be encountered.

On a separate note, I'm a plastic modeler and actually working on an M10 right now. :)
Hung up cause I can't figure out the right road wheels to use for a historical vehicle :/
Reply
:iconmechazoidfallen:
Mechazoidfallen Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
Really awesome work. I love the mid cold war inspired look.
Reply
:iconfrozenwhitenorth:
frozenwhitenorth Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist Writer
Great design and a well thought out concept. Technically, a gun stabilizer would still be fine though, since that is usually a gyro stabilization system. Its a small issue I have, but not a major one.
Reply
:iconcsp499:
Csp499 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Complete with bulky coincidence rangefinders.
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2017  Professional General Artist
It seems appropriate. My life is full of bulky coincidences.
Reply
:iconfriessner:
Friessner Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
This looks awesome—especially the colour pallette. I do have a question, though: A gun that big has a lot of recoil, but it doesn't look like there's much room in that turret for a gunner and a recoiling barrel. How does it work?
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Professional General Artist
There's a bit more space than it looks like, or at least it's tailored to the problem. :)

It can actually recoil most of the way back into the bustle. The turret holds two crew which sit to the sides. The gun is loaded from a hydraulic autoloader located beneath the turret ring. The overlapping of the breech at full recoil with the turret ring naturally limits maximum elevation, but this thing is pretty much direct fire only and relies on shell velocity to make the platform work.
Reply
:iconmetalsnail:
MetalSnail Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Very cool tank design!
Reply
:iconredwolfradolf:
redwolfradolf Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
I like the soloution.  Everything too high tech?  All your drone-soldiers getting hacked or EMP'd?  Go back in time, and they have no idea how to handle it.
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2017  Professional General Artist
Thanks. I got inspired by some cyberpunk game I read about where the street gangs used swords because gunshots could be so easily detected and rapidly triangulated by the police. Don't remember the name, though.
Reply
:iconredwolfradolf:
redwolfradolf Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2017
That sounds cool. If you ever remember what that was called let me know!
Reply
:icontomsymonds:
tomsymonds Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Professional Artist
sweet. Love the wide rangefinders.
Reply
:iconavarus-lux:
Avarus-Lux Featured By Owner Edited Feb 6, 2017   General Artist
return to the basics, i really like the description you gave here.




as for the people that are concerned with the grenades... they really are not a issue, it is acting as artillery or as long range fire support in engagements with troop support, preventing grenade chucking in the first place. (the binoculars protruding from the turret give away its more of a long range anti tank artillery and not a m10 clone like "closer ranged" tank destroyer, even though it can fullfill that role very likely as well)

the second remark about shrapnel being an issue;
A, most shrapnel loses its deadly and/or damaging energy fairly quickly and
B, its shrapnel... not explosives or targeted bullets and dont have the same effects or effectiveness, that srhapnel is what helmets and (light) body armor were designed for
C, if the tank is expected to have engagements that have the chance to encounter heavy shrapnel effective fire or grenade chuckers alike.... then there is always the few add-on options that enable a crew to cover the open top of the turret, options like the M10 or M39 tank destroyer lines had for example:

www.worldwar2aces.com/store/im…
www.somap.pl/images/assortment…




personally the only problems i see with this tank are currently that it is
A: a bit to long for its width (track to tank size ratio).
B: i know tanks are cramped and small, but this takes it tojust a bit to far imho, the crew should be scaled down just a little bit, as is with the tank... currently even the m22 locust or m24 chaffee look more comfy...

www.militaryfactory.com/armor/…

hell even the t-26 and such from the russians back then look more comfy XD...

c1.staticflickr.com/6/5643/210…


ah well, if the soldier fit... they sit, and if it works... don't change a winning formula :P
Reply
:iconblack-sweater:
Black-Sweater Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Hot dayum look at this sexy thang<3
that's a tank buster if i ever saw one.

and a gorgeous one at that!<3
Reply
:iconmacphersonscircus:
macphersonscircus Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
A very interesting concept, Mike.  I like it!!!
Reply
:iconironclad00:
Ironclad00 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist Writer
It's okay, Mike.  I get it.  It's an artillery piece.  At that, it's a quick and dirty artillery piece.  Armor is a secondary consideration, since it should never be directly engaged anyway.  People are just thinking of it in terms of how they would handle it in the relatively short-range engagements of Battlefield with the 'grenade' thing.  I've seen real-world designs with an open top like that, and for a country like Burma, the quick and dirty solution is all the more believable.  TOMORROW IS YESTERDAY!
Reply
:iconbulletproofcheetah:
BULLETPROOFCHEETAH Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
When in doubt return to the basics, well done!Ayato Fixation 50X50 GIF 
Reply
:iconbioazard:
bioazard Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
really cool tank :)
and nice explanation !
Reply
:icontypeproton:
TypeProton Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017   Digital Artist
What are the tubes that jutted from the sides of the turret?
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Professional General Artist
That's an optical rangefinder. It's like two periscopes on their sides. You use them to get a distance to your target via triangulation.
Reply
:iconfirest:
Firest Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017
I suspect they are periscopes for aiming.  This is supposed to be a low-tech weapon after all.
Reply
:iconexanju:
exanju Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017
Cool design, but... If the operators are 1:1 compared to the size of the tank then it is too small.. imo. Those guys would need to sit in fetus poses to fit in..  Still like eye said.. cool desing
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Professional General Artist
Yeah, you're right. I'll fix that soon.
Reply
:iconneighborvoid:
neighborvoid Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Can't remember what it's called, but isn't there usually a thing in the middle of the barrel that prevents the gases from going back into the tank?
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Professional General Artist
Fume extractor. Neat devices, but the even the small holes in the barrel they would need to work would be unsafe at the higher chamber pressures this beast uses.
Reply
:iconterranabassador:
TerranAbassador Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017  Student Digital Artist
That's a big gun for such a small vehicle.
Reply
:iconthesniperofaustraila:
TheSniperofAustraila Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
looks like a m10 or M36 tank destroyer
Reply
:iconthe-last-dragon-kni:
The-Last-Dragon-Kni Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Is that open topped or a glass roof?
Reply
:iconmikedoscher:
MikeDoscher Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017  Professional General Artist
Open top. They needed the gun depression.
Reply
:iconthe-last-dragon-kni:
The-Last-Dragon-Kni Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Poor guys, hello grenade magnet
Reply
:iconthelasthokuten:
TheLastHokuten Featured By Owner Edited Feb 5, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
That's why tanks always have infantry support, to protect them from close range engagements against mobile enemies where they would have the disadvantage. Tank destroyers being a vehicle with the specific role of engaging other armored vehicles, it would also typically be fighting at ranges (300-1000+ meters depending on the specs of the gun and ammunition) far beyond that possible with hand grenades.

The crews and the people supporting them were keenly aware of the vulnerabilities of the tank (both the open top and every other kind of vehicle) and did everything in their power to avoid letting the enemy get in a position to exploit whatever weaknesses were peculiar to them. Therefore, when this vehicle was in operation, if there was ever a discernible risk for grenades or gunfire to be directed to the inside of the turret when moving into an area, that tank would avoid it to mitigate that risk.

With these ideas in mind, I'd go so far as to say these kinds of tanks, never once, in all of history, were faced with the risk of a grenade being thrown inside. If not, then it was such a rare occurrence as to be statistically insignificant and not worth considering from a design standpoint. Keep in mind I am talking specifically about grenades, not other risks like gunfire or indirect fire weapons. Thanks.
Reply
:iconpachumaster:
Pachumaster Featured By Owner Edited Feb 5, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
to be fair, these are expected to engage at long range and it also has reactive defences.
Reply
:iconthe-last-dragon-kni:
The-Last-Dragon-Kni Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
Reactive defences would be nearly as dangerous as a grenade seeing as they usually are grenades.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
February 5
Image Size
881 KB
Resolution
4500×2500
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
6,165 (24 today)
Favourites
457 (who?)
Comments
63
Downloads
150 (1 today)
×